TAFE news

The Scan #176 16 December 2015

News

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Rebalancing Victorian VET

skills (1)

16 December 2015     |     The Victorian government has released the Final Report of The VET Funding Review (Mackenzie Report).  It’s a weighty document, both literally and figuratively, running to 173 pages and 109 recommendations. Skills minister Steve Herbert says the government accepts the “general thrust” of the report and its recommendations.  It will take the next year to work through design and implementation issues and to consult with stakeholders ahead of the introduction of a new funding model in 2017.  Certain matters, however, are given, such as restoring the public provider network (TAFE) as the bulwark of quality in the VET system, imposing stricter regulatory and contract compliance on providers and formally abandoning the “open market” approach of its previous government….[ READ MORE ]…..

VET -“more work needed”

14 December 2015    |      Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, state premiers and chief ministers have agreed to more closely review reforms and Race to the bottomregulation, which had begun under the original COAG National Partnership Agreement on skills – initially created in April 2012 under Prime Minister Julia Gillard.  The COAG meeting in Sydney on 11 December 2015 agreed that “further work will be undertaken on options to reform vocational education and training, for initial consideration at COAG’s first meeting in 2016, recognising that skills ministers will continue to work together to address key VET system challenges.”  Training ministers for NSW and Victoria also signalled their dissatisfaction with current vocational education policy, with NSW minister John Barilaro describing current VET FEE-HELP arangements as “a race to the bottom” ….[ READ MORE ]……

Job axe to fall at UWA

UWA

14 December 2015    |    The University of Western Australia (UWA) will lay off 300 staff as part of sweeping cuts aimed at reducing costs. The university will slash 100 academic positions and 200 professional positions early next year.  Fifty new academic positions will be created to enhance the university’s “capability and impact in areas of comparative advantage”.  UWA vice-chancellor Professor Paul Johnson said in a statement that 2015 had been a challenging year for the Australian higher education sector.  National Tertiary Education Union WA secretary Gabe Gooding said the union is outraged and that there is no justification for sacking 300 staff when the university made a $90 million operational surplus in 2014….[ READ MORE ] ….

Calculator

VET FEE-HELP skewering VET

11 December 2015      |       Explosive growth in the VET FEE-HELP scheme has masked massive direct public disinvestment in vocational education and training. While a report by NCVER shows a notional growth of 1.7% in 2014 over 2013 (plus $141.0 million, from $8512.4 million to $8653.4 million), it’s all in VET-FEE Help payments: actual direct expenditure by governments, including the Commonwealth declined markedly VET FEE-HELP. ….[ READ MORE ]…..

Innovating an “ideas boom”

Innovation

7 December 2015      |       Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull unveiled his much-anticipated Innovation Statement, saying he wanted to drive an “ideas boom”. The statement allocates almost $1.1 billion over the next four years to promote business-based research, development and innovation.  A key focus of the plan revolves around strengthening ties between the business community, universities and scientific institutions.
A $200 million innovation fund will co-invest in businesses that develop technology from the CSIRO and Australian universities. CSIRO will also get an extra $20 million to help commercialise research outcomes….[ READ MORE ]…..

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

To subscribe to The Scan….


……. just hit the button below, give us your details and submit. Then when an edition of The Scan is published, you’ll get an email newsletter.  

Subscribe2

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Milestones

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Neil Coulson named Victorian Skills Commissioner

16 December 2015

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Mr Coulson has extensive experience working in industry and was the CEO of the Victorian Employers Chamber of Commerce and Industry (VECCI) from 2000 to 2007.  He has also held a number of other senior roles in industry including Chief of Australian Manufacturer Jacyo Corporation from 2007 to 2012 and was a member of the Victorian Learning and Employment Skills Commission between 2001 and 2004.

………………………………………………………………………………………….……

Neil Coulson

read-more-button2

__________________________________________________________________________________________

Comment & analysis

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
16 December 2015

Time to end the exploitation of vulnerable people

The case for REAL reform

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

It’s hard to argue with the proposition that Australia’s vocational education sector is a mess.  Mary Leahy (University of Melbourne) writes that tightening regulation and tweaking some of the settings will contain the damage, but these measures alone will not address deeper problems in the sector.   Real, sustained improvement requires rethinking the funding and regulatory models but also the purpose and idea of vocational education.

………………………………………………………………………………………….……

 

VET Reform

There is clear evidence of rorting and rent-seeking in the vocational education and training (VET) sector.

The behaviour of some training providers, agents and brokers is nothing short of despicable. Thousands of students are being signed up to courses that they have little or no chance of completing.

The business model is fairly simple:

    • Register as a training provider and ensure your students have access to VET FEE HELP income-contingent loans.
    • Sign up as many students as possible for single or double diplomas.
    • The student takes on a VET FEE HELP loan to defer payment of course fees.
    • The training provider receives the VET FEE HELP payment from the government.
    • As long as the student is enrolled beyond the census date, the training provider is paid.
    • Even if the course is never started, the provider will receive funds from the government and the student is liable for the debt.

read-more-button2

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

One size does not fit all

The case for a new university type

Republished 16 December 2015

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Many of our universities are teaching focused rather than research focused.  Why is this a bad thing?  The Lisbon Council, which rated the Australian system highly, considered that while world-class research is an important aspect that allows some universities to turn out first-class students, for the system as a whole the educational mission is paramount.

The national protocols that govern our system ought to reflect the reality, that we have a continuum of university institutional types from research-intensive to teaching-intensive.It is past time we addressed the fiction that all universities are research-intensive and that all academics need to be research-active to be good teachers.

Across Australia there are multi-campus universities that cannot maintain the research activity on all campuses that is supposed to sustain the nexus. Many universities have recognised that good teaching is informed by scholarship by creating teaching-only positions that emphasise scholarship, being currency of knowledge and understanding, over the ideal of research as pure, original discovery.

 

 

UNIVERSITY STOCK

 

read-more-button2

_________________________________________________________

The importance of universities to Australia’s prosperity

28 November 2015

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

 Universities Australia commissioned Deloitte Access Economics to analyse the contribution that universities make to Australia’s economic and social prosperity. This work was undertaken to inform the development of Universities Australia’s Keep it Clever—Policy Statement 2016.  The report seeks to present a comprehensive and coherent framework of benefits generated by universities. This includes examination of the conceptual role of universities in Australian society and how they contribute to the success of the nation, as well as a more detailed analysis of the benefits directly attributable to universities. The scope of the analysis does not include a detailed examination of the economic activity generated by university operations, but rather examines the contribution made to the productive capacity of the economy through universities’ teaching and learning, research discovery and adoption, and community service activities.

………………………………………………………………………………………….……

Lightbulbs1

As institutions, universities embody social, economic and intellectual resources which combine to generate benefits on a local, national and global scale. They equip students with the knowledge and skills that allow them to make greater contributions to society; they generate and disseminate knowledge which enhances productivity and improves living standards; and they provide a myriad of broader community benefits.

This report canvasses and examines the various ways in which universities contribute to our economic and social prosperity and how, given the economic imperatives confronting Australia, the sector’s role is likely to evolve and grow over time.

 

read-more-button2

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PolArt
CLICK IMAGE

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Chakra1Chakra

Chakara at 179 Acland St, St Kilda, and 387 Hampton St, Hampton has an extensive range of quality and unusual gift items. You can order online through Chakra’s Facebook page.

Chakra6

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Caroline2

Contact-me-150x150

_________________________________________________________

How teaching funds research in Australian universities

16 December 2015

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

A report by the Grattan Institute report finds that universities earn up to $3.2 billion more from students than they spend on teaching, and have powerful incentives to spend the extra money on research. International students, who usually generate more revenue per student than domestic students, contribute a substantial proportion of this surplus. The report’s author, Andrew Norton, says the finding is concerning because, while university research matters to Australia, the evidence that it improves teaching is less clear. He observes that direct spending on teaching, by contrast, is far more likely to ensure that universities offer the high-quality courses students want. In this commentary in The Conversation, Norton observes that the priority of research within universities means that teaching does not always get its share of time and money. He proposes that any new funding system must ensure that money intended for teaching is spent on teaching.

Unis

read-more-button2

__________________________________________________________

Life & stuff

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Christmas 2015

__________________________________________________________

subscribe

__________________________________________________________

Noticeboard

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The VET Store

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

The VET Store is a  service by the VET Development Centre which provides access to a range of information to support VET practitioners in the work they do.

VET Development Centre
Click image to find out more!

__________________________________________________________

Click to listen
Click to listen

Radio Double Karma on Pandora

Adult contemporary music

The Fray…London Grammar…Leonard Cohen…Dixie Chicks…Peter Gabriel…Of Monsters and Men…Krishna Das…Cold Play…Snow Patrol….Clck hereAretha Franklin

You do need to sign up to listen but it’s free (for the first 40 hours a month)

__________________________________________________________

Is there something interesting near where you live and/or work? Got an interesting story? Got an event coming up? Tell us about it!

subscribe

Reforming vocational education: it’s time to end the exploitation of vulnerable people

The case for REAL reform

Republished 16 December 2015

………………………………………………………………………………………………………Mary Leahy

It’s hard to argue with the proposition that Australia’s vocational education sector is a mess.  Mary Leahy (University of Melbourne) writes that tightening regulation and tweaking some of the settings will contain the damage, but these measures alone will not address deeper problems in the sector.   Real, sustained improvement requires rethinking the funding and regulatory models but also the purpose and idea of vocational education.

………………………………………………………………………………………….……

 

VET Reform

How the business model works

There is clear evidence of rorting and rent-seeking in the vocational education and training (VET) sector.

The behaviour of some training providers, agents and brokers is nothing short of despicable. Thousands of students are being signed up to courses that they have little or no chance of completing.

The business model is fairly simple:

  • Register as a training provider and ensure your students have access to VET FEE HELP income-contingent loans.
  • Sign up as many students as possible for single or double diplomas.
  • The student takes on a VET FEE HELP loan to defer payment of course fees.
  • The training provider receives the VET FEE HELP payment from the government.
  • As long as the student is enrolled beyond the census date, the training provider is paid.
  • Even if the course is never started, the provider will receive funds from the government and the student is liable for the debt.

Chasing the dollar

This has given reprehensible providers a stream of revenue without the expense or trouble of providing much in the way of education.

Fees have grown, with a number of providers charging over $10,000 for a diploma.

The figures are staggering. A total of $2.4 billion in VET-FEE HELP was paid to training providers in 2015 (up to November 15), a big increase from $1.7 billion in 2014.

Yet graduation rates for many providers were abysmal, well under 10%.

Other providers do graduate their students, pushing them through qualifications in improbably short times. The approach has been described as “tick and flick”.

In Victoria alone, around 9,500 qualifications were revoked in one year.

The suggestion that payment should be shifted from when a student starts a course to when they complete it will not prevent the rorting, although it may force some providers to at least go through the motions of offering an educational program.

This outcome was predicted

Some shake their heads and say that no one could have foreseen what has happened. But it was predicted.

Prominent academic Leesa Wheelahan consistently argued that the reforms would result in a race to the bottom. Others expressed similar views in the media and within the sector.

The TAFE institutes have been hit hard, with a significant reduction in market share. Conditions are also difficult for any private operators with a genuine commitment to vocational education when competitors offer quicker, easier qualifications.

How have governments responded?

Governments have taken some action. Training providers are no longer permitted to provide incentives such as laptops and iPads, although there is evidence the practice has continued.

Providers will no longer receive up-front payment for the whole course. Funding for the loans has been frozen.

The Department of Education and Training is preparing to receive loan applications rather than leaving the training providers to process these.

These initiatives are to be applauded.

Key government reviews into funding, quality and the private training providers have also been undertaken. The extent of their impact on government policy is still emerging.

Alternative options being considered

Other options are being debated across the sector. These include risk-based approaches to regulation of providers and/or qualifications.

It has been suggested that students should be charged a minimum fee so they have “skin in the game”.

Questions are being asked about the wisdom of allowing the same organisation to train, assess and issue a qualification.

There is interest in finding reliable ways of distinguishing between providers that seek to deliver high-quality education and training, from operations seeking to milk public funding.

There is also renewed interest in the practice of teaching, which has been marginalised over the past 30 years.

Significant profits have been extracted but scrutiny from various regulatory bodies and the media has had an impact.

A number of large training businesses are in serious trouble. The Vocation group has folded and Australian Careers Network’s shares have been suspended since October. More will follow.

How did we get here?

The current situation has been built by layers of reform intended to create a vibrant, responsive sector that provided greater choice and flexibility for students.

The Council of Australian Governments (COAG) agreements in 2009 and 2012 led to the implementation of demand-driven training systems across Australia.

The idea was to give students greater choice and make providers more responsive to students and employers.

Victoria was the first state to implement the reform. Rapid growth in subsidised training rather predictably led to a massive budget blowout.

The government’s commitment to the market model was ironclad, leaving adjustment to the subsidy or funding rates as its only response.

A dramatic cut in May 2012 was followed by other significant reductions. Other states followed, introducing variations of the Victorian model, all hoping to avoid the pitfalls.

The lack of certainty encouraged providers to game the system and direct students into the courses that attracted higher levels of subsidy. In some cases this was a matter of survival. This problem was compounded once access to VET FEE HELP was expanded.

Longer-term shifts in the sector have also impacted the quality of vocational education.

The marginalisation of teaching, which is starting to be reversed, is one factor. Another is a form of outcomes-based education that does not recognise development and growth and is stripped of the knowledge we need for employment and citizenship. This raises fundamental questions about the purpose and function of vocational education.

Key issues

One of the problems with a market in education is that only after the course has been completed can the quality of education and training be assessed.

Another issue is that the vocational education market is based on flawed assumptions about the way we form preferences and make decisions.

There is a body of research that demonstrates that we do not operate as rational economic agents. We are all influenced by the way options are framed. Our preferences are not fixed. Our assessment of risk is shaped by our circumstances, particularly the opportunities available to us and the timing of any rewards and costs.

These findings challenge the assumptions underpinning user-choice policies.

Choosing a VET course is complex. There are five levels of qualifications, thousands of providers and specific rules about entitlement to government subsidy and VET FEE HELP loans.

A number of research projects are examining young people’s choices about study and work. It is apparent that the difficult circumstances some face limit the meaningful opportunities available to them.

The behaviour of providers and agents that exploit the hopes of people seeking to improve their prospects should continue to be exposed and condemned. But we also need to examine fundamentally flawed funding and regulatory models that allow and reward the exploitation.

Looking forward

Measures to control VET-FEE HELP will rein in the worst excesses.

Some operators will leave the sector. Others are reviewing their policies and practices. Hopefully governments will act on recommendations such as those produced by the Victorian VET Funding Review.

However, considerable risks remain when there is pressure to extract a profit and limited opportunities to cut costs without compromising the quality of provision.

This is compounded when students are unable to judge the value of their course until it is too late.

Politicians, policymakers and commentators need to ask whether the market can deliver what was promised by reforms in this sector and by the recently adopted competition policy.

We also need to reconsider the type of vocational education developed and delivered in Australia.

Some researchers argue for a more coherent approach to vocational development. Qualifications will be organised within broad vocational streams such as engineering or care work. Social partners will play a role in identifying the capabilities that will underpin qualifications. Courses will be designed to develop the knowledge, skills and attributes a person needs to work in their vocational stream.

In this way people will be prepared for a career, not just for a job that may be transformed or disappear. The approach is designed to build trust in the quality and relevance of qualifications.

A system that demands robust vocational education will not be attractive to those focused on extracting excessive profits.

Wasting public funds is a serious matter, but more troubling is the trashing of the vocational education system and the exploitation of vulnerable people.

The Conversation

Mary Leahy, Academic, Melbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne. This article was originally published on The Conversation. Read the original article.

Rebalancing VET in Victoria

Review proposes “a more managed,sustainable training system”

16 December 2015

skills (1)

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

The Victorian government has released the Final Report of The VET Funding Review (Mackenzie Report).  It’s a weighty document, both literally and figuratively, running to 173 pages and 109 recommendations. Skills minister Steve Herbert says the government accepts the “general thrust” of the report and its recommendations.  It will take the next year to work through design and implementation issues and to consult with stakeholders ahead of the introduction of a new funding model in 2017.  Certain matters, however, are given, such as restoring the public provider network (TAFE) as the bulwark of quality in the VET system, imposing stricter regulatory and contract compliance on providers and formally abandoning the “open market” approach of the previous government.

………………………………………………………………………………………….……

 

Bruce Mackenzie who undertook review with Neil Coulson
Bruce Mackenzie who undertook review with Neil Coulson

In their introduction to the report, reviewers Bruce Mackenzie (formerly CEO of Holmesglen Institute) and Neil Coulsen, (formerly CEO of VECCI and newly appointed as Victoria’s Skills Commissioner) observe that there has been too much change, too quickly, with almost overnight changes in subsidy levels, which have proved highly destabilising to the VET system overall and laid waste to a significant public asset in the TAFE network (the latter is our interpretation, not their actual words).

They state their purpose as proposing measures to rebalance the system so the “design, incentives and administration promote quality training…to restore stability… and value to the system”:

In recent years, too much of the system has been driven by provider behaviour, rather than supporting students to make informed training decisions, or to protect them from opportunistic or unethical behaviour.  There has been too much emphasis on increasing both the number of providers and the intensity of competition between them, and not enough care taken in ensuring they are delivering quality training. There has been too much focus on increasing the volume of training, and not enough on whether the training leads to positive outcomes for the students such as employment and further education.

The report doesn’t bag the concept of contestability, just the way successive governments have gone about it:

Contestability can, if properly implemented, drive innovation, efficiency and improvement across the sector.  But government cannot simply declare something contestable, open up the market and hope that it works. It needs to design and administer the market more carefully, guided by the outcomes it seeks achieve.

That’s a pretty good summary of all that has gone wrong – all of it quite predictable – in Victoria, at least, over the last five or six years.

The proposed measure that’s attracted immediate attention is the introduction of a price signal (or “co-payment”, if you prefer).  The rationale is that reintroducing a standard fee is a way to make students or their employers more conscious that a training entitlement, under the Victorian Training Guarantee, is limited and not free.  If student makes a poor choice enticed by “no fees”, the student might exhaust their entitlement.  Disadvantaged students would get concessional rates.

While the overwhelming bulk of Victorian RTOs are covered by the national regulatory regime, through the Australian Skills Quality Authority, state governments have significant de facto regulatory heft through their control of funding levers: they can determine who does and who doesn’t get access to public funding (in Victoria through the Victorian Training Guarantee – VTG).  The report portends a further tightening of access rules (which have tightened considerably over the past year already), which would include empowering the Auditor–General  to audit private providers in receipt of public funding.  It also proposes a system of “classification of providers, based on VET capacity and financial and organizational stability.   Allied to this would be the negotiation of “compact” agreements with highly rated providers which would encompass outcomes-based funding and include performance measures. The successful attainment of performance measures would result in lighter auditing and reporting arrangements.  While smaller and specialist providers would not be excluded from VTG funding, in a budget capped system (as already announced by the minister and provided in the review’s terms of reference), it would mean that providers in compact arrangements would be, in effect, “preferred” providers.

To manage training expenditure within the existing budget, it is proposed that enrolment limits be placed on individual providers.

The VET budget (currently capped at $1.2 b a year) would comprise:

  • a general pool of contestable VTG funding – that is, all funding for enrolments in training at both government and non-government providers;
  • an allocation to support provision in thin markets (which might be allocated on a tender basis):
  • funding to continue concession arrangements;
  • an allocation for a workforce innovation fund, which would focus on initiatives to improve workforce productivity at an industry or firm level and perhaps provide some funding for applied research
  • a specific allocation to meet the costs, obligations and restrictions placed on TAFE institutions; and,
  • an allocation for community service grants (which might also be allocated on a tender basis).

To manage training expenditure within the existing budget, it is proposed that enrolment limits be placed on individual providers.

It is proposed that restrictions on subcontracting by VTG providers be further tightened so that a small portion of the delivery of a qualification can be delivered be delivered by another provider.  This is to prevent, for example, where a qualification appears to be from a capable provider, but a significant part of the training is undertaken by a lower-capability provider.

At the heart of this report is restoring the much rundown fortunes of TAFE in the VET system.  In addition to recent government initiatives, such as the Rescue TAFE Fund, the report proposes a number of interventions to improve the position of these institutes and to make them sustainable as It says that TAFEs face costs, obligations and restrictions that other providers do not and which inhibit their capacity to compete in the training market. The measures include:

  • the minister making a clear statement about the role of TAFE institutes in Victorian VET (and we would add the economy and community);
  • funding institutes for some of the obligations imposed upon them by virtue of public ownership; and,
  • developing a compact which involves TAFE institutes responding to government priorities, as well as identifying their communities’ educational and training needs, negotiating these with government and meeting agreed outcomes.

The review also gives a big tick of approval to the concept of a “polytechnic university” (as long advocated by Mackenzie himself – and The Scan).  As defined in the report, a polytechnic university would be a type of university offering higher education underpinned by VET programs, that meet the needs of industry, enterprises and students by being applied in nature and closely demonstrating the link between theory and practice.  The target group would be students who do not follow conventional pathways to tertiary education and training.  It proposes a detailed examination of the utility and place of such a type of institution in the Victorian tertiary landscape.

In what might be seen as something less than a tick of approval of ASQA, the report proposes the establishment of a VET Quality Assurance Office to develop standards (and presumably police them) in relation to market entry requirements for a VTG contract, protocols for training, standards for marketing VET courses, registration of brokers and aggregators (such as Acquire Learning) and “other matters associated with maximizing student outcomes”.

In addition, the office would have a role in conducting strategic reviews of industries and qualifications, identifying and investigating systemic issues and risks, and would have responsibility for outsourcing activities such as the development of the proposed provider classification system.

A VET Quality Funding Office would be responsible for contractual arrangements and managing the State’s relationship with training providers, including payments. It would be responsible for the development of an investment plan and monitoring provider performance and contract compliance.

The Victorian government generally only funds training for those people seeking to undertake a qualification at a higher level than the one they hold.  The Review some refinements to the upskilling requirement that in some circumstances, people can receive government support to re-train at the same qualification level. Exemptions proposed are:

  • people under the age of 24;
  • long-term unemployed (greater than 12 months);
  • workers who have been retrenched; and d. people with qualifications older than 7 years.; and,
  • people returning to the labour force after an extended absence from the upskilling requirement.

People exempt from the eligibility exemptions would be required to attend an approved provider in the first instance, TAFE institutes.

In response, skills minister Steve Herbert said the government supports, in general, the review’s proposals for “a more managed, targeted and Steve Herbertcontestable system that better links training to industry and job outcomes, guarantees additional funds for TAFEs, and ensures only quality training providers receive government funding.” He said:

A training system that delivers quality and industry relevant skills is vital to improving productivity, creating jobs and increasing Victoria’s economic growth. The Andrews Labor Government will take a more hands-on role in the VET system to support strong public TAFEs and Learn Local organisations.

He said matters that would be given attention include general adherence by VTG_approved to the notional volume of learning in a qualification and rationalisation of courses that would be eligible for funding under VTG (from something like 3,000 to 700 as in NSW.

The reforms to be developed over the coming year would revolve around six themes:

  • a clear vision for VET in Victoria, targeted to meeting industry need and providing job outcomes;
  • a responsive and sustainable model that promotes lifelong learning;
  • defining clear roles for TAFEs and community sectors to ensure strong and sustainable systems;
  • transparency for students, industry and employers;
  • supporting quality and continuous improvement; and,
  • promotion of equity for learners of all abilities.
 See
VET_Funding_Review
Skills_and_Jobs_Ed_State_Response
One size doesn’t fit all unis

 

“Further work” needed on COAG VET reforms

VET funding a “race to the bottom”, NSW skills minister says

TDA News   |     14 December 2015

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, state premiers and chief ministers have agreed to more closely review reforms and regulation, which had begun under the original COAG National Partnership Agreement on skills – initially created in April 2012 under Prime Minister Julia Gillard.

………………………………………………………………………………………….……

VET ReformThe COAG meeting in Sydney on 11 December 2015 agreed that “further work will be undertaken on options to reform vocational education and training, for initial consideration at COAG’s first meeting in 2016, recognising that skills ministers will continue to work together to address key VET system challenges.”

Martin Riordan, Chief Executive of TDA said the recent meeting in Hobart of state and territory ministers with Minister for Vocational Education and Skills Luke Hartsuyker, had questioned the proposed transfer of responsibility for VET to the Commonwealth, with some ministers pointing to federal mismanagement of VET FEE-HELP loans, as an example of capacity problems under such a plan.

Riordan said:

The National Partnership Agreement on skills reform from 2012 has been a disaster.  Industry and students have been hampered by waste on a scale not witnessed in the VET sector, and worse, matched almost exactly by the withdrawal of federal incentives to employers on apprenticeships and traineeships

It is pleasing that this COAG meeting has flagged a wider review of current VET policy, and how it is impacting industry and students.”

Training ministers for NSW and Victoria also signalled last week their dissatisfaction with current vocational education policy, and the need for changes.

NSW skills minister John Barilaro says the ongoing private college issue is hurting the economy because small businesses are not getting the skilled workforce they need.

He told the Council of Small Business Australia that billions of dollars had been wasted because of a lack of proper outcomes for small businesses and young people:

Let me just make it absolutely clear – what you hear about VET-FEE HELP is a problem the federal government created, not the state

If the feds actually copied the NSW state’s process when it comes to vocational education and training, we wouldn’t have had this problem.

We should be funding training on outcomes not on sign-ups and enrolments. It’s been a race to the bottom on enrolments under the VET-FEE HELP process.

The Scan #175 11 December 2015

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

News

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

VET FEE-HELP skewering system

 

Calculator11 December 2015      |       Explosive growth in the VET FEE-HELP scheme has masked massive direct public disinvestment in vocational education and training. While a report by NCVER shows a notional growth of 1.7% in 2014 over 2013 (plus $141.0 million, from $8512.4 million to $8653.4 million), it’s all in VET-FEE Help payments: actual direct expenditure by governments, including the Commonwealth declined markedly VET FEE-HELP.  VET funding through state and territory governments fell almost $320m, while fee-for-service ¬revenue — largely contributed by businesses — fell more than $130m. Federal government funding through channels other than VET FEE-HELP fell almost $500m.  Financial information 2014 shows that VET FEE-HELP is supplanting traditional forms of VET financing, as state governments and businesses withdraw hundreds of millions of dollars from the sector. Government spending fell $416m last year, even though Canberra shovelled an extra $1.06 billion into VET FEE-HELP….[ READ MORE ]…..

Innovating an “ideas boom”

Innovation

7 December 2015      |       Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull unveiled his much-anticipated Innovation Statement, saying he wanted to drive an “ideas boom”. The statement allocates almost $1.1 billion over the next four years to promote business-based research, development and innovation.

A key focus of the plan revolves around strengthening ties between the business community, universities and scientific institutions.
A $200 million innovation fund will co-invest in businesses that develop technology from the CSIRO and Australian universities. CSIRO will also get an extra $20 million to help commercialise research outcomes.
The mechanisms for funding university research are being simplified, with more focus on industry collaboration and less on publishing articles in academic journals. The six block grant schemes will be collapsed into two, with equal rating for research excellence and income from industry. The government will add $127 million in funding for university research over the next four years.
The previously endangered National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Scheme will receive $1.5 billion over 10 years for projects such as ocean monitoring, advanced manufacturing and medical research.
There will also be $800 million over the decade for two major scientific projects: the Australian Synchrotron in Melbourne (which uses light beams a million times brighter than the sun to generate discoveries) and the Square Kilometre Array (the largest radio telescope ever constructed).
The government will spend $84 million “inspiring” Australians in digital literacy and science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM). This includes new money to upgrade teachers’ digital skills, educational apps and $13 million to boost the participation of girls and women in STEM….[ READ MORE ]…..

Research quality soars

5 December 2015     |     The inaugural State of Australian University Research 2015–16: Volume 1 ERA research2National Report comprehensively details the quality of Australian university research benchmarked against world standards.  It identifies the excellence in research across a broad range of universities and the outstanding performances in areas of specialisation. Overall the quality of Australian university research continues to improve. The report confirms Australia’s university research performance is amongst the best in the world. In 2015, 89% of the assessed research areas in Australian universities is rated as world class, up from 68% in 2010….[ READ MORE ]…..

Phoenix crashes…and burns

Phoenix

5 Decemebr 2015    |      Melbourne’s Phoenix Institute has shut down its “real world division” (that is, its face-to-face, classroom rather than online delivery) as a result of a federal government crackdown which has seen VET FEE-HELP funding to the entire sector frozen and legal action initiated by the ACCC. Some 260 transpersonal counselling and art therapy students are affected by the closure.  Phoenix is one of a large number of colleges to have grown exponentially through its sale of online diplomas around Australia, using government money under the VET FEE-HELP scheme.It started the year claiming $200,000 per month from government to pay for courses, but by September, it was applying for a variation, claiming an annual payment of $300 million – or $25 million per month – a 125-fold increase….[ READ MORE ]….

Crackdown looming 

Crackdown1

4 December 2015    |    New rules to better protect students in the vocational education and training sector will come into effect from 1 January 2016 with the passage of the Higher Education Amendment (VET FEE-HELP Reform) Bill 2015 on 3 December. The changes a requirement providers assess the student’s capacity to undertake the course for which they are enrolling.  Ahead of the introduction of a new funding model in 2017, the total loan limit for existing VET FEE-HELP providers will be frozen at  2015 levels. There will also be tougher entry requirements for registered training organisations seeking to become a VET FEE-HELP provider….. [ READ MORE ]…..

Vocation collapses entirely

Vocation snip30 Novemebr 2015    |    Less than a week after going into voluntary administration education and training services company Vocation has been closed down, leaving 150 of its 180 employees without a job and more than 10,000 students in limbo.  In a statement on Monday 30 November 2015, administrators Ferrier Hodgson advised that as a result of further customer contract terminations, the lack of available liquidity to fund operations and the lack of ongoing support from key stakeholders, the voluntary administrators of Vocation Ltd have had no alternative but to cease the majority of the company’s operations effective from 30 November 2015...[ READ MORE ]….

ACCC hits up Phoenix for $106 m

26 November 2015    |  The Australian Competition and Consumer

Carpetbagger
Loot in the bag…?

Commission (ACCC) has accused leading VET provider Phoenix Institute of false, misleading and unconscionable conduct and is seeking recovery of $106 million in Commonwealth funding through VET-FEE HELP.   The ACCC claims Phoenix tricked disadvantaged people into signing up for multiple courses and incurring large debts to the Commonwealth.  The alleged victims included those with intellectual disabilities, and people on Aboriginal communities. Sales people authorised by Phoenix signed them up to multiple online diploma courses which cost $18,000 each, even though some did not have access to the internet or computer skills.  The Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA)  has also announced that it proposes cancelling Phoenix Institute’s registration as a training organisation, meaning it will then be ineligible for further government funding ….[ READ MORE ]….

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

UA News

read-more-button2
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Go8 Nov

read-more-button2

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
NCVER Insight November 2015

read-more-button2__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Milestones

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Murdoch names new vice-chancellor

3 December 2015

……………………………………………………………………………………………………… Internationally experienced university leader and academic, Professor Eeva Leinonen has been selected as Murdoch University’s next vice-chancellor, which has been shaken for more than a year by power struggles and a probe by the West Australian Corruption and Crime Commission..

………………………………………………………………………………………….……

Eeva

Professor Leinonen is currently a deputy vice-chancellor at the University of Wollongong, a role she has held since 2012. Prior to this she was Vice Principal (Education) at King’s College London.

She has an academic background in linguistics and psychology and has extensive experience in higher education in the United Kingdom, Europe and internationally, including 19 years at the University of Hertfordshire, where she served as Deputy Vice Chancellor and Dean of Health and Human Sciences.

read-more-button2

__________________________________________________________________________________________

Comment & analysis

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Venting about VET 

regulatory-jigsaw5

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

25 November 2015     |    An RTO operator, who wishes to remain anonymous (fair enough),  laments that the reputable “sprats”, such as herself, are being caught up in the net intended to catch the “sharks” in the VET ocean.

………………………………………………………………………………………….……

Governments in Australia extol the virtues of small business – for their contributions to employment and innovation, for example – but in the training industry “small” is starting to be an impossible feat.  It’s getting to the point that an RTO can only survive if it has an extremely large scope and doesn’t specialise, as that gives it the flexibility to game the system to survive constant funding and regulatory changes.

…what we have seen in recent times is the proliferation of “sharks” in the VET ocean – alpha predators, who are big mean and nasty.  Governments are casting a net – not before time, either – to at least rein them in.  But the VET “sprats” – smaller reputable providers – are emerging as “collateral damage”, caught in the net intended to capture the sharks and subject to an ever increasing burden of regulation which, in context, is unnecessary.  By and large, the sprats aren’t the problem authorities are trying to net.

sprat
READ MORE

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Once was TAFE

8 December 2015

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

There’s been a growing chorus of outrage over the looting of VET FEE-HELP by a handful of VET providers, coupled with disbelief that the government and regulatory agencies could have had such lax safeguards as to allow this to happen. It was all perfectly predictable. On 29 April 2012, The Scan published Once was TAFE, a commentary on the then Victorian government’s introduction of so-called “competitive neutrality” in the public funding of VET. It’s a piece that has stood the test of time. It does beggar belief that having been witness to the chaos that was occurring in the Victorian system courtesy of open access to funding and manifestly inadequate regulatory procedures, the Commonwealth could basically repeat the mistakes of Victoria in extending access to VET FEE-HELP – and then let it run unchecked for a couple of years. 

………………………………………………………………………………………….……

invisible_hand_of_the_market1-300x199

The past couple of years have been like Christmas time for carpetbaggers in the Victorian VET sector. The “skills reform” initiated by the former Labor government opened up public funding of vocational educational and training provision to all comers.  And as to the field of dreams, the private RTOs have flocked.   At the end of September 2011, 721 providers were delivering government subsidised enrolments in Victoria, almost 80 more than at the same time in 2010 and 160 more than in 2008. The share of government subsidised enrolments by private providers increased from 14% in 2008 to 36% at the end of September 2011 and is now in excess of 50%.

These are sudden and dramatic shifts, which have resulted in the apparent destabilisation of a number of the public TAFE institutes.  In 2011, the combined surpluses of the 14 standalone TAFEs in Victoria, which fund really important things like infrastructure and facilities, halved, from$192m to $98m.  Analysis by sector specialist Gavin Moodie reveals that if you discount one-off capital items, the underlying operating results are pretty bleak, with only 4 of the 14 standalone TAFEs operating in the black.

read-more-button2

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

9 December 2015

Beggaring belief

Fairfax Media reports on the $1 million cost to taxpayers of completed Human Resource Management Diplomas at the so-called Australian Institute of Professional Education (AIPE) – Aussie dollars$111 million paid out in VET FEE-HELP in 2014 for just 117 completions.  Meanwhile The Oz reports that the Australian Competition an Consumer Commission is taking a third provider – Empower Institute – to court over allegations of “misleading or deceptive and unconscionable conduct” when marketing its courses to remote communities across the country (it will follow Unique International and Phoenix College to the Federal Court dock) – it enrolled 14,000 in 2014 for just 5 completions, which would work out at over $10 million for each completion !!!  

And while  VET FEE-HELP was being looted, what was ASQA, the sector regulator, doing?  Not a lot it seems: it got around to launching an investigation into AIPE in November 2015 – that’s right, last month. 

read-more-button2

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Anatomy of a scandal

How did the Australian VET system get here?

8 December 2015

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Jim Davidson, a former senior official of both the Victorian and Commonwealth governments and now a Senior Honorary Fellow of the LH JimMartin Institute, dissects the  crisis now enveloping the VET sector. As as he asks: How  could this have happened?  Good question. He says future policy responses by government need to deal with the root causes of the current growth in VET FEE-HELP and not further exacerbate the issues caused by the current policy settings.  And he proposes that an immediate measure should be  a moratorium on VET FEE-HELP loans for online course delivery and establish an enquiry to formulate appropriate requirements and costings for online delivery of nationally accredited qualifications including a benchmark completion rate.  It’s a bit of a no-brainer: ALL the providers under investigation and/or being prosecuted by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission have one thing in common: online delivery.

skills (1)

read-more-button2

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

8 December 2015

ACPET dismayed, too

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Rod Camm2ACPET’s Rod Camm expresses dismay over the raft of changes in relation to VET FEE-HELP legislated last week  -and fair enough, too, because the blameless will be collateral damage in cracking down on the utterly blameworthy rorters.  But Camm also poses the question that has occurred to most VET sector participants and observers: how could this have been allowed to happen?  He answers the question thus: 

Without….checks and balances this could only mean Government has been approving this phenomenal growth, in a relatively small number of public and private providers, blind.

………………………………………………………………………………………….……

Print

Of course the last week was, and the week coming, will be dominated by discussion about the Higher Education Support Amendment (VET FEE-HELP Reform) Bill 2015.

As you would all be aware, the Government introduced the changes with no forewarning or consultation.

On hearing of the changes, I flew to Canberra to meet with Ministers, the Opposition and Senators in an attempt to rectify the problems, particularly the Freezing of VFH accounts at 2015 levels. Unfortunately, the Bill was passed that day, less than 24 hours after it was introduced.

Many members have expressed their concerns and it is important that you continue to do so. What disappointed me was that I, along with other representatives from the sector are appointed to a VFH Reform Working Group. To be on this group we were required to sign detailed confidentiality agreements. The Group only met a week ago where we discussed a range of reforms. Unfortunately there was not a word of the changes the government was about to introduce. Not sure I will attend this group again.

read-more-button2

_________________________________________________________

The importance of universities to Australia’s prosperity

28 November 2015

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

 Universities Australia commissioned Deloitte Access Economics to analyse the contribution that universities make to Australia’s economic and social prosperity. This work was undertaken to inform the development of Universities Australia’s Keep it Clever—Policy Statement 2016.  The report seeks to present a comprehensive and coherent framework of benefits generated by universities. This includes examination of the conceptual role of universities in Australian society and how they contribute to the success of the nation, as well as a more detailed analysis of the benefits directly attributable to universities. The scope of the analysis does not include a detailed examination of the economic activity generated by university operations, but rather examines the contribution made to the productive capacity of the economy through universities’ teaching and learning, research discovery and adoption, and community service activities.

………………………………………………………………………………………….……

Lightbulbs1

As institutions, universities embody social, economic and intellectual resources which combine to generate benefits on a local, national and global scale. They equip students with the knowledge and skills that allow them to make greater contributions to society; they generate and disseminate knowledge which enhances productivity and improves living standards; and they provide a myriad of broader community benefits.

This report canvasses and examines the various ways in which universities contribute to our economic and social prosperity and how, given the economic imperatives confronting Australia, the sector’s role is likely to evolve and grow over time.

 Universities’ operations make significant contributions to Australia’s economic output

Australia’s university sector directly employs over 120,000 staff and supports the delivery of education to over one million students. The operations of the university sector generate significant contributions to Australia’s economic output and national income.

    • The sector contributed around $25 billion to the Australian economy both directly and indirectly in 2013, accounting for over 1.5% of Australia’s GDP and 160,000 fulltime equivalent (FTE) jobs.
    • In 2014–15, education related exports accounted for 5.7% of Australia’s total exports, representing the largest service export and the third largest export category overall. Higher education is the single biggest contributor to this, representing around two-thirds of the total value.

read-more-button2

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PolArt
CLICK IMAGE

_________________________________________________________

How teaching funds research in Australian universities

28 November 2015

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

A report by the Grattan Institute report finds that universities earn up to $3.2 billion more from students than they spend on teaching, and have powerful incentives to spend the extra money on research. International students, who usually generate more revenue per student than domestic students, contribute a substantial proportion of this surplus. The report’s author, Andrew Norton, says the finding is concerning because, while university research matters to Australia, the evidence that it improves teaching is less clear. He observes that direct spending on teaching, by contrast, is far more likely to ensure that universities offer the high-quality courses students want. In this commentary in The Conversation, Norton observes that the priority of research within universities means that teaching does not always get its share of time and money. He proposes that any new funding system must ensure that money intended for teaching is spent on teaching.

………………………………………………………………………………………….……

 

UnisNo-one knows exactly how universities spend their money. But questions are asked about how universities have financed huge growth in the amount of research produced over the past 15 years – and a new report by the Grattan Institute could have the answer.

It finds that, in 2012, universities spent at least $2 billion on research that was meant for teaching. This means that around one dollar in every five was spent on research rather than tuition.

Universities are not doing anything improper in spending money this way.

The current legislation pays universities on student numbers, but is silent on how exactly the money should be used.

But the absence of specific teaching funding makes it hard to ensure that any extra money intended to benefit students is actually spent on students.

So why are universities so focused on funding research? And is there a need to be more transparent about how universities spend their money?

read-more-button2

__________________________________________________________

Life & stuff

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

A  candle in memory of David

8 December 2015

Candle
On 9 December 2006,17 year old David Iredale and three mates went for a hike in the Blue Mountains as part of their Duke Of Edinburgh Award program.  They planned it pretty carefully and they had detailed maps and stuff. But it all went terribly wrong: the maps indicated a fresh water source along the route, which wasn’t there. It was hot -mid-30s centrigrade- and they’d run out of water. Somehow, David became separated from his mates – my recollection is that as the strongest of the hiking party, he struck out ahead of the others to seek assistance. He became severely dehydrated and rang emergency services on his mobile phone. It was very poor reception but he tried to get across to the operators the dire circumstances of his plight. He made a number of calls, to no avail. Various operators kept asking for his street address. He kept telling them he was on a big rock near a walking trail in the Blue Mountains. But they kept demanding his street address. He asked for a helicopter to be sent.  He was told off for being abusive. In the event, nobody did anything. David’s body was recovered some days later. Each year at this time, I reflect on this terrible episode and remind myself to be not indifferent to the plight of others.  I tell my kids, if you get into any sort of real trouble, you ring me and/or your mother FIRST; we might argue later, but we’ll address the trouble first.

And I light a candle in memory of David.

__________________________________________________________

One Hundred Stories

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Monash University’s commemoration of the Great War.

…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Wall of Commemoration
The One Hundred Stories are a silent presentation. They remember not just the men and women who lost their lives, but also those who returned to Australia, the gassed, the crippled, the insane, all those irreparably damaged by war. The Great War shaped the world as well as the nation. Its memory belongs to us all.

read-more-button2

<

__________________________________________________________

Noticeboard

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

The VET Store

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

The VET Store is a  service by the VET Development Centre which provides access to a range of information to support VET practitioners in the work they do.

VET Development Centre
Click image to find out more!

__________________________________________________________

Click to listen
Click to listen

Radio Double Karma on Pandora

Adult contemporary music

The Fray…London Grammar…Leonard Cohen…Dixie Chicks…Peter Gabriel…Of Monsters and Men…Krishna Das…Cold Play…Snow Patrol….Clck hereAretha Franklin

You do need to sign up to listen but it’s free (for the first 40 hours a month)

__________________________________________________________

Is there something interesting near where you live and/or work? Got an interesting story? Got an event coming up? Tell us about it!

subscribe

VET FEE-HELP “skewing” system

Direct public expenditure on VET dropping

The Australian   |     10 December 2015

………………………………………………………………………………………………………

Explosive growth in the VET FEE-HELP scheme has masked massive direct public disinvestment in vocational education and training.  While Calculatora report by NCVER shows a notional growth of 1.7% in 2014 over 2013 (plus $141.0 million, from $8512.4 million to $8653.4 million), it’s all in VET-FEE Help payments: actual direct expenditure by governments, including the Commonwealth declined markedly VET FEE-HELP.  VET funding through state and territory governments fell almost $320m, while fee-for-service ­revenue — largely contributed by businesses — fell more than $130m.  Federal government funding through channels other than VET FEE-HELP fell almost $500m.

………………………………………………………………………………………….……

 

NCVER Financial 2014

Financial information 2014 shows that VET FEE-HELP is supplanting traditional forms of VET financing, as state governments and businesses withdraw hundreds of millions of dollars from the sector. Government spending fell $416m last year, even though Canberra shovelled an extra $1.06 billion into VET FEE-HELP.

The figures predate an even bigger shift to the training loans this year. As observed by John Ross of The Australian, “they suggest that Australia’s world-recognised public VET system is being colonised by a rort-ridden scheme which graduates fewer than one-fifth of its students.”

Victorian Skills Minister Steve Herbert said the scheme was “skewing the entire training system”, inducing students and colleges to abandon state-funded VET:

People who should have done lower-level qualifications closely linked with jobs (are) being sucked into high-cost diplomas that they never complete.

NCVER managing director, Craig Fowler, said the figures suggested there may have been a “significant rebalancing” in the sector. He said other centre research indicated that the loan scheme had increasingly attracted unprepared students studying online — all indicators that they were “more likely to fail”:

Many appear to have come from backgrounds and educational circumstances which meant they were poor recruits into a program at that level.

The federal government has moved to revamp the scheme following  reports of widespread rorts and poor completion rates, Fowler said the figures suggested that many more ill-prepared students had already taken out loans this year and “he outcomes may well continue to be less than good.

 

State spending on staff plunged by $397m, reflecting widespread job losses in TAFEs.

 


 

Key Points

 

NCVER Key points


 

See
Financial information 2014

Maddock steps down

2 December 2013

John MaddockJohn Maddock, chief executive of Box Hill Institute in Melbourne has announced he will step down from the role at the conclusion of his contract on 7 December.

After 14 years as chief executive, Maddock informed staff on 29 November that with senior executive roles needing to be filled, and the Institute’s new five year Plan soon to begin, it was time to “rejuvenate” and he had decided to step down.

He paid tribute to Box Hill staff and students, and their work which contributed to the emergence of Box Hill as one of Australia’s most successful TAFEs in student course offerings, launch of higher education qualifications including a Masters degree, and extensive international education delivery. Last week Box Hill was recipient of the International Training Provider of the Year 2013.

The abrupt nature of Maddock’s resignation – unexpected and quite immediate – has led to speculation that he might have fallen out with his Board.

But who knows – no one’s told us anything.

What we do know is that Maddock leaves a a more than respectable legacy to his successor:  a strong and integrated tertiary education institution .

Catch Up

TAFEs claim funding cuts will cost jobs and millions

 The Age      |    23 November 2013

Victorian TAFEs expect to lose millions of dollars and the education union is forecasting hundreds of redundancies in response to further Victorian state government changes to course subsidies.  But the government insists it has not cut overall funding and is moving to stop rorting in the training sector.

 Kangan Institute chief executive Grant Sutherland told staff in an email the changes would result in an estimated $9.2 million reduction in revenue for next year.

 This is clearly a substantial reduction and budgets across the institute are currently being reworked to take into account this impact.  In the interim, as we work through this, approval for staff appointments will be on hold.

 Victoria University deputy vice-chancellor Anne Jones said the changes would cost it  about $3.7 million.

NSW bill tags TAFE as ‘major’ provider

The Australian   |    22 November 2013

The NSW opposition says its amendment to a vocational education bill will force the state government to back away from plans to open training funds to full competition. But the government says the amendment to the bill, which passed parliament on 19 November, won’t change to its “Smart and Skilled” reform plans. 

The upper house amendment to the bill, which establishes a new advisory body called the NSW Skills Board, had previously been rejected by the government-dominated lower house. But the government ultimately agreed to the alteration, which means the Skills Board can only oversee reform that “maintains the TAFE Commission as the major provider of vocational education and training”.

‘Light touch’ could have weighty consequences, says TEQSA chief

The Australian     |      21 November 2013

Carol Nicoll, chief commissioner of  the Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency has criticised commentary on the Commonwealth government’s deregulation agenda.  Nicoll told a Senate estimates committee hearing the issue of “a light touch regulator is a significant one, and one that Australia should not take lightly”:

I would hesitate at the use of the term ‘light touch’.   It may signal overseas, particularly in Asia, that Australia is not regulating higher education.

Pyne touts exam for aspiring teachers

The Australian     |    20 November 2013

Aspiring teachers would need to sit a national exam under Commonwealth government plans to assess their proficiency before entering the classroom, under a plan to be taken to a meeting of the nation’s education ministers  on 29 November .

A policy paper prepared for proposes measures to focus on the quality of graduates rather than the length of their course, questioning the decision to replace the 12-month diploma with a two-year post-graduate degree.

The exam would also allow a shortcut to graduation for high-achieving students.

Vocational course subsidies ‘gamed’

The Australian     |       20 November 2013

Ongoing cuts and tweaking to vocational course subsidies under Victoria’s open market system is undermining business certainty.  And too many providers of dubious standard are threatening quality, according to University of Melbourne vocational expert Leesa Wheelahan.

Wheelahan isn’t alone. A private provider, frustrated by another round of changes this week, said the bar to entry needed to be raised to weed out providers that game the system by simply shifting their operations to wherever they can get the highest subsidy.

The provider, who asked not to be named, backed proposals by the National Skills Standards Council for a tougher system of licensing. Under the system, smaller providers without licences could partner with larger ones that have invested in heavily in being accredited and so effectively act as guarantors of quality.

Piccoli calls for cap on teaching degrees

Sydney Morning Herald    |    20 November 2013

NSW Education Minister Adrian Piccoli has called for a cap on the number of students allowed to enrol in teaching degrees to curb the state’s oversupply of primary school teachers. 

Fairfax Media has revealed that more than 40,000 teachers are on a waiting list for permanent jobs in NSW and the oversupply of primary teachers is likely to last until the end of the decade even if resignations or retirements double.

Inspiring university teachers awarded

Office of Teaching and Learning    |    19 November 2013

Australia’s best university teachers have been recognised at the 2013 Australian Awards for University Teaching. Senator Scott Ryan, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister for Education, congratulated the 13 teachers for their outstanding work, along with recognising nine individual university programs that enhance student learning saying.

The Australian Awards for University Teaching are a nationally recognised marker of esteem.  The outstanding university teachers and programs deserved to be recognised and celebrated for their exceptional work. This year’s recipients have worked to engage students in active learning and relate their curriculum to the world in which we live.  But as commentator Stephen Matchett notes, not actually not a lot of esteem attributed to  winners, as shown by, for example the awards being presented by a parliamentary secretary and the scant media coverage

CQU ‘comprehensive” not ‘dual’

The Australian   |     18 November 2013

Australias newest dual-sector university, CQUniversity, will instead be calling itself “comprehensive”, with vice-chancellor Scott Bowman warning  that thinking of the institution in two parts will simply create hierarchies. 

Bowman, whose CQUniversity merges with Central Queensland Institute of TAFE in July,  said Dual sector means two parts, and if you say higher education, then you’ve got lower education.   This won’t be a dual sector university. We’re talking about being a comprehensive university.

Canberra University to bypass union on pay deal

ABC News    |     12 November 2013

The University of Canberra has announced it will bypass the union representing university academics and take a proposed pay offer direct to staff.

University management has been in talks with the National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) for almost a year but negotiations became deadlocked over a proposal to link pay rises to the amount university funds are indexed by the Federal Government.

TDA Newsletter 25 November 2013

tda news

TAFE shines at Australian Training Awards

TAFE Institutes were in the spotlight at the 2013 Australian Training Awards in Perth on Friday.

TAFE NSW – South Western Sydney Institute was named national Large Training Provider of the Year.

The award recognises a registered training organisation (RTO) that has demonstrated outstanding achievement in all aspects of the delivery of vocational education and training.

The judges noted South Western Sydney Institute’s ‘Bright Ideas’ initiative to improve workforce capability in innovation and its successful collaboration with industry partners.

The success of this initiative led to the TAFE NSW – South Western Sydney Institute Innovate model, under Peter Roberts, Institute Director, and led to successful collaborations with industry partners, improved data benchmarking and focus on workforce development.

Congratulations to TAFE finalists in this category: Batchelor Institute of Indigenous Tertiary Education, and Kimberley Training Institute.

TAFE’s success continued, with Victoria’s Box Hill Institute named as the International Training Provider of the Year.

Under John Maddock, CEO of Box Hill Institute, there has been a strong focus on international partnerships, with Box Hill boasting one of the largest portfolios of international students.

The International category award recognises a RTO that has demonstrated outstanding achievement in all aspects of the delivery of vocational education and training to full-fee paying international students.

Despite Box Hill’s national award, it was not included in the initial list of 22 private VET colleges and TAFEs judged by the Department of Immigration and Border Control to to be low risk in their dealings with international students. (See next article).

Finally, TAFE NSW – Western Sydney Institute won the Industry Collaboration Award for their successful industry collaboration with Racing New South Wales. The award recognises an exemplary skills development collaboration between an employer or industry body and, at least, one other organisation.

TAFE NSW – Western Sydney Institute and Racing New South Wales have formed a strategic partnership, known as the Australian Racing and Equine Academy, to make  the racing industry more professional, safe and sustainable through the provision of workforce development services across New South Wales.

Our congratulations also goes to other major Awards –

  • Markeeta Douglas , the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Student of the Year, following health science studies at TAFE NSW – Western Sydney Institute
  • Ashlee Hodson, Australian Apprentice (Trainee) of the Year, who completed a Certificate III and Certificate IV at TAFE NSW – South Western Sydney Institute
  • Morgan Clementson, runner up for Australian Apprentice of the Year, a mature aged student in bread making (Cert III in Food Processing – Baking/Bread), TAFE NSW – Illawarra Institute
  • Joel Schwarz, winner of the Australian School-based Apprentice of the Year, supported by SuniTAFE, in automotive mechanical technology.
  • Jacky Cheng, VET teacher of the Year, who is a visual arts teacher at Kimberley Training Institute, WA.
  • Bert Evans AO, VET Lifetime Achievement Award, following his role as the Chair of the NSW Board of Vocational Education and the VET Accreditation Board.

See the Australian Training Awards winners.


Inconsistent approach to streamlined visa processing – TDA Board Communique

The TDA Board meeting in Perth has issued a Communiqué seeking intervention from the Australian government on international education.

A key issue nominated in the Communiqué is the extraordinary contradiction of leading TDA member Box Hill Institute being awarded International Training Provider of the Year, yet being excluded from the initial offers by the Department of Immigration and Border Control (DIBC) for streamlined student visas.

A recent article in The Australian concerning extending streamlined visa processing (SVP) to a small group of non-university higher education providers also highlighted the inconsistency.

Government policy is to extend SVP to low risk and high quality providers. The approach taken by DIBC is to only focus on the first part of this policy—an approach totally inconsistent with the original offering of SVP to all universities. Despite a number of universities recording a relatively high risk in visa compliance, their overall quality was considered sufficient to enable them to participate in SVP.

TDA continues to argue that TAFE institutes which offer higher education degrees are all of sufficient quality to be treated in the same way. This has apparently not been the case, especially with several of our TAFE institutes in Victoria which are internationally and domestically recognised as outstanding providers of high quality teaching programs.

See the TDA Board Communiqué.


TDA CEO meets Federal Minister Ian Macfarlane on issues impacting industry and TAFE on national entitlement

Left to right: Industry Minister, Ian Macfarlane; ABC 7.30 Political Editor, Sabra Lane; Minister Macfarlane’s Chief of Staff, Kirsty Boazman; and TDA Chief Executive, Martin Riordan, outside the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry dinner in Canberra, last week.

Martin Riordan, Chief Executive of TAFE Directors Australia, met with the Minister for Industry, Ian MacFarlane, and senior ministerial advisers on issues surrounding the phased introduction of the national entitlement to training.

The entitlement or ‘student voucher’ scheme was initiated by former Labor Government, through its National Partnership Agreement on Skills, but was introduced without financial modelling.

The Australian Industry Group and the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry have expressed concerns about the voucher entitlement scheme, focusing on steep rises being authorised by states and territories to apprenticeship and training fees, and inconsistencies across jurisdictions on which courses would be included under entitlement.

TDA supports business concerns, and is seeking an urgent review of the entitlement scheme, including closer financial support ahead of fees across regional TAFE centres, and impact to SME employers of apprentices and trainees.


Gender gap closing for qualifications says COAG

Women are less likely to achieve a higher qualification, but the gap between women and men is closing, according to the first report to COAG on the status of women and girls.

In 2002, the proportion of women aged 20–64 years with higher level qualifications (at or above Certificate level III) was 13 percentage points lower than men (37.7% for women compared to 50.7% for men).

However, over the past ten years the proportion with higher level qualifications rose faster for women than it did for men. By 2012 the gap had closed to 3.5 percentage points—and women under 30 were more likely than men under 30 to have higher qualifications.

See the COAG report.


ASQA seeking comment on new VET reporting arrangements

The COAG Standing Council on Tertiary Education, Skills and Employment (SCOTESE) agreed on 7 June to arrangements for the introduction of mandatory total VET activity data collection and reporting by all registered training organisations (RTOs) from 1 January 2014.

This initiative requires all RTOs to gather and collate AVETMISS-compliant records of all students and all competency enrolments and outcomes achieved, throughout a calendar year.  Early in the following year, RTOs must report this data to NCVER unless they have previously done so through existing contractual arrangements.

The Australian Skills Quality Authority (ASQA) has written to TDA with the information about these new requirements and also requested feedback on their implementation. Feedback is required by this Friday.

See the following links for more information:

TDA member advice

The national policy

The 12-month transition arrangement

AVETMISS data reports

Vital community services information

Website information


TEQSA invites feedback on reform plans

The Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA) has issued two discussion papers covering critical areas of regulatory reform, and invited comment and feedback from TDA.

The first paper, ‘Future directions for TEQSA’s Regulatory Risk Framework’ covers ways to improve the regulatory framework under risk-based regulation of the higher education sector.

The second paper, ‘Future directions for TEQSA’s regulatory processes’ outlines ways TEQSA plans to reform its regulatory approaches.

Submissions close 4 December 2013.

See Future directions for TEQSA’s Regulatory Risk Framework

See Future directions for TEQSA’s regulatory processes


TDA national conference Occasional Paper now online

The complete proceedings of the TDA 2013 National Conference, TAFE Redefined’, are now available in an Occasional Paper which covers speakers, presentations and workshops.

The paper outlines all the major issues and debates covering the two-day conference and the pre-conference workshops.

Click here for the Occasional Paper.


Development of an Australian VET Graduation Statement

The Australian Qualifications Council (AQFC) released a Consultation Paper in October, titled Development of an Australian VET Graduation Statement’.

The AQFC paper is attached, as is the draft response from TAFE Directors Australia (TDA) and the Victorian TAFE Association (VTA).

In essence the TDA/VTA draft response maintains that the paper fails to articulate any convincing arguments for the benefits of a graduation statement in the vocational education and training context.

TDA welcomes comment /feedback on this response by Monday 2 December prior to a meeting with the AQFC secretariat on 5 December.

See the AQFC Consultation Paper.

See the TDA/VTA draft response.


TAE Training Package webinars

Innovation and Business Skills Australia has issued a reminder about the TAE Training & Education Training Package consultation workshops that are currently underway.

Due to overwhelming demand there are now a number of webinars for those who missed out on a place in the workshops.

The webinars are open to anyone interested in having their say about the upcoming changes to the TAE Training Package. Registration is necessary.

For more information and registration, click here.


Opportunities for researchers

Applications are now open for NCVER’s new round of post-graduate research funding.

NCVER is offering $5000 grants to existing post-graduate students for research papers on an aspect of their post-graduate research.

Students set to start a PhD in 2014 are also eligible to apply for a PhD top-up scholarship, valued at $5000 per year for three years.

Be quick! Applications close Wednesday, 18 December 2013.

See here for more information.


Diary Dates

VET Development Centre – The VET BLOG
For relevant news and articles about the VET sector
DETAILS: Click here.

National Association of Enabling Educators of Australia
Flexibility: Pathways to Participation

DATE: 27-29 November
LOCATION: Australian Catholic University, Melbourne Campus
DETAILS: Click here for further information.

Universities Australia
Higher Education Conference: Stirred not shaken

DATE: 26-28 February 2014
LOCATION: National Convention Centre, Canberra
DETAILS: Click here for further information.

NCVER Research Forum
Realising our potential: widening participation through education and training

DATE: 3 April 2014
LOCATION: Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre
DETAILS: Click here for further information.

AVETRA 17th Annual Conference
Informing Changes in VET Policy and Practice: The Central Role of Research

DATE: 22-24 April 2014
LOCATION: Outrigger, Surfers Paradise, Queensland
DETAILS: Click here for further information.

Edu TECH
National Congress and Expo

DATE: 3-5 June 2014
LOCATION: Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre
DETAILS: Click here for information.

‘No Frills’ – 23rd National Vocational Education and Training Research Conference
DATE: 9-11 July 2014
LOCATION: Holmesglen, Moorabbin Campus, Melbourne, Victoria
DETAILS: Coming soon.

TDA Newsletter 11November 2013

TDA banner_02


More apprentices start training

Commencements of trade and non-trade apprentices increased in the September quarter, according to early trend estimates from the National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER).

Trade apprentice commencements rose from 22,700 in the June quarter to a new high of 27,200 in the September quarter.

Non-trade commencements have increased in the last two quarters, from 33,700 in the March quarter to 43,600 in the September quarter. This follows a period of decline in the preceding four quarters.


Warning to international students

The NSW Government and the education sector have issued a warning to international students over the activities of the Overseas Students Association (OSA.

Deputy Premier and Minister for Trade & Investment Andrew Stoner said the OSA is purporting to represent international students in NSW, however, it is not supported or recognised by the NSW Government, education providers, industry peak bodies or international student organizations.

“We have acted swiftly to protect our international students with a coordinated response across Government and the education sector to the activities of the OSA which have raised some serious concerns.

“This warning offers sound advice to international students regarding the OSA and confirms that the Council of International Students Australia (CISA) is recognised as the representative body for international students in NSW,” he said.

See the media release.


VET pathway to university blocked

The idea of a pathway from vocational education and training (VET) to higher education might be good in theory, but not if the university is one of a group that restricts access to VET graduates.

The National Centre for Vocational Education Research (NCVER) has identified marked differences in the rates at which universities admit VET award holders.

Across Australia, approximately 10% of students are admitted to higher education on the basis of a VET award.

NCVER identifies three ‘clusters’ of universities based on their admission of VET students. At the top end is a group of seven universities that admit 19% of VET students. At the bottom is ‘cluster 3’—14 universities that admit just 3.3% of students based on a VET award.

The report says these low rates should be a ‘policy concern’ and may be exacerbating national skills shortages in occupations where these universities are the dominant providers.

“Not surprisingly, the Group of Eight Universities sits within Cluster 3, probably a consequence of their status and the high level of competition for places from school leavers,” the report says.

See the report, ‘A half open door: pathways for VET award holders into Australian universities.


Western Australian team heads to national awards

A talented team of finalists from Western Australia will represent the state at this year’s Australian Training Awards.

Three organisational and six individual finalists were among the winners from the WA Training Awards, while WA will also be represented in the ATA’s Excellence in Language, Literacy and Numeracy Practice Award.

Congratulating each finalist on their achievement, Department of Training and Workforce Development Director General Ruth Shean said they reflected the quality of the state’s training sector.

Winners will be announced at the Australian Training Awards in Perth on November 22.

See the finalists and more information here.


China domain name scammers active in Australia

TDA recently received an email from a supposed domain name registry office in China alerting it to the fact another company in China wished to register tda.cn as a domain name. This is a scam, as the follow up emails invite applicants to register their company or institute name with them at a hefty price.

Various websites and blogs alerted TDA to the scam, with Jim Wang from yg-registry warning many people of its existence.

Those interested in registering a domain name in China can go here.


Victorian government international education strategy

Two weeks ago the Victorian Government announced the release of its 2013-2018 international education strategy with a projected investment of $17.5 million.

It outlines four strategic action areas: Market Development, Quality, Student Experience, and Marketing and Branding.

There are a total of 19 initiatives under these headings including: provision of 150 internships per year for international students to gain meaningful work experience; the establishment of a Victorian international education advisory body; and a trial public transport concession scheme for annual tickets with providers contributing to the cost.

See the strategy.


Understanding streamlined visa processing

Victorian TAFE International has developed a paper, ‘Streamlined Visa Processing: Victorian TAFE Building Best Practice’, to help providers better understand Streamlined Visa Processing (SVP).

This report details the pros and the cons of joining. It summaries the experience of universities, using data and interviews with key university staff in Victoria to outline the volume of work involved in preparing to opt into the system, and the ongoing work required to successfully monitor the risk of accepting students who may later default.

The paper is available for sale at the website.


ACCC releases free online education units

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has released a free online education program for tertiary institutions to help educate students about their rights and obligations under competition and consumer laws.

The modules are suitable for any student interested in competition and consumer law, and can be incorporated by tertiary institutions into a wide variety of courses.

Find out more here.


Future Unlimited applications close 18 November

The Austrade/ETS promotion of a year’s free study in Australia plus travel and living expenses has gained a great response from around the world with over 18,000 applications.

There is only one week to apply.

Partner education institutions include TDA members, TAFE NSW, RMIT and Swinburne.

More information is available here.


Skills @ Work seeking articles

The Department of Industry is calling for articles for the December 2013 edition of the Skills @ Work newsletter – the final for 2013.

If you would like to contribute an article, please write a paragraph lead in and provide a link to a relevant website for more information. As this is the last edition until February 2014, please include events and activities up to the end of February.

Email your article to skillsatwork@industry.gov.au by COB Monday 18 November 2013.

Contributions may be on, but not limited to, any of the following topics:

  • training packages news/updates
  • new vocational education and training initiatives/projects
  • new teaching and learning resources and products
  • new vocational education and training related research
  • vocational education and training conferences and professional development events.

VET pathways seminar tonight in Melbourne

There are still a few spaces left to a free thought leadership event in Melbourne tonight on the topic of educational pathways.

The forum, jointly hosted by the VET Development Centre and TDA, will consider recent research and data relating to pathways – what makes for successful transition from secondary to tertiary and from VET to higher education.

See the flyer for more information.


Diary Dates

2013 Webinar series
Queensland VET Development Centre

DATE: August – November
DETAILS: Click here for further information.

VET Development Centre – The VET BLOG
For relevant news and articles about the VET sector
DETAILS: Click here.

2013 AAIR National Forum
Australasian Association for Institutional Research

DATE: 13-15 November
LOCATION: Perth, Western Australia
DETAILS: Click here for more information.

Risk Management for Tertiary Education Sector
Australian Institute of Company Directors and Association for Tertiary Education Management

DATE: 15 November
LOCATION: Sydney, NSW
DETAILS: Click here for more information.

conVerge13 – E-learning Conference
eWorks

DATE: 21-22 November
LOCATION: Melbourne Convention & Exhibition Centre
DETAILS: Click here for more information.

Australian Training Awards
Department of Industry, Innovation, Climate Change, Science, Research and Tertiary Education

DATE: 22 November
LOCATION: Perth
DETAILS: Click here for further information.

National Association of Enabling Educators of Australia
Flexibility: Pathways to Participation

DATE: 27-29 November
LOCATION: Australian Catholic University, Melbourne Campus
DETAILS: Click here for further information.

AVETRA 17th Annual Conference
Informing Changes in VET Policy and Practice: The Central Role of Research

DATE: 22-24 April 2014
LOCATION: Outrigger, Surfers Paradise, Queensland
DETAILS: Click here for further information.

‘No Frills’ – 23rd National Vocational Education and Training Research Conference
DATE: 9-11 July 2014
LOCATION: Holmesglen, Moorabbin Campus, Melbourne, Victoria
DETAILS: Coming soon.